HOME
Western Cape Transport Conflict
PREV                 INDEX                 NEXT

The Centre for Conflict Resolution (CCR) has been appointed as the official mediator.

 

RECORD OF DECISIONS
MEETING ON THE WESTERN CAPE TRANSPORT CONFLICT
Held on 17 July 2000
at the Centre for Conflict Resolution

  1. Attendance

    The following parties were represented at the meeting: the MEC Transport (and senior officials, including traffic officials); the MEC Community Safety (and senior officials); the Attorney General's Office; the taxi associations, Codeta and Cata; Golden Arrow bus company and drivers' union; the SAPS; and community police forums (Khayelitsha, Langa, Nyanga and Gugulethu).

    The parties decided to give observer status to two organisations, the Peninsula Anti-Crime Association (PEACA) and the Khayelitsha Civic Association (KCA), that had not been invited to the meeting. It was further agreed that this decision would not constitute a precedent for further meetings of the parties.

    The meeting was chaired by Laurie Nathan, Executive Director of the Centre for Conflict Resolution (CCR), appointed by the parties on 10 July 2000 as the facilitator/mediator of the process of resolving the Western Cape transport conflict.

  2. Record of decisions

    It was agreed that CCR would distribute to the parties a record of the decisions taken at the meeting, and that the parties would be requested to confirm in writing the accuracy of this record.

  3. Principles regarding normalisation

    The parties confirmed their support for the 'general principles on normalisation' (Appendix 1). The parties agreed that CCR would communicate these principles to the public through a press release.

  4. Process to be followed

    The parties accepted the Chairperson's proposal that they pursue dialogue and/or negotiations on specific issues through working groups that comprise the relevant parties and that are limited to a small number of delegates per party. The working groups will meet over the following days and weeks, with facilitation support from CCR.

    The parties agreed on a list of issues of concern; on the clustering of these issues; and on the parties that should be present at meetings to address these issues (Appendix 2).

    The parties agreed that over the next 48 hours they would submit to CCR their written proposals for concrete action that could be taken to address the issues grouped in the `violence cluster'. On receipt of these proposals, CCR would arrange meetings with the relevant parties.

    Golden Arrow stated that it regarded the prosecution of bus drivers in respect of previous protest action as a high priority issue. The taxi associations stated that they regarded the impoundment of taxis by law enforcement agencies as a high priority issue. It was agreed that arrangements to address these matters would be made by the relevant parties immediately after the close of the meeting.

  5. Public communication

    The parties supported the `proposed agreement on public communication regarding the Western Cape transport conflict' (Appendix 3)

  6. Payment of the facilitators

    The parties supported the Chairperson's proposal that payment to the facilitators be sought from a corporate sponsor. The Chairperson added that he would consult the parties once potential sponsors had been identified.

  7. Date of next meeting

    The parties agreed that the next plenary meeting would be held at the Centre for Conflict Resolution at 10:00am on 8 August 2000.

LAURIE NATHAN
Executive Director

25 July 2000

 


Back to Report

Appendix 1

GENERAL PRINCIPLES ON 'NORMALISATION'

  • Commuter passengers would have a choice of mode of transport.

  • Everyone could operate and make use of the various modes of transport without fear for their lives or property.

  • All operators would be properly licensed and operate within the legal framework.

  • No violence.

  • Even-handed and equal application of the law.

  • Proper support from the relevant provincial and national authorities.

  • Decisions affecting the commuter transport industry would be taken with the input of all the relevant stakeholders.

     


    Back to Report

    Appendix 2

    ISSUES OF CONCERN AND RELEVANT PARTIES

    Violence [all parties]

    Cessation of violence

    Peace initiatives (e.g. monitoring)

    Public threats and inflammatory statements

    Transport [provincial transport dept (including traffic authorities); Golden Arrow; taxi associations; community police forums; and, where necessary, dept of community safety; CCR]

    Public communication on transport policy

    Taxi permits: special sessions of the Local Road Transportation Board

    Taxi permits: objections to permit applications

    Transformation of the Local Road Transportation Board

    Interim transport arrangements: schedules (including weekend timetables); overcrowding of routes

    Subsidy to Golden Arrow

    Other

    Impounding of taxis [Director of Public Prosecutions; taxi associations; traffic authorities; provincial dept of transport; SAPS; dept of community safety; CCR]

    Prosecution of bus drivers following protest action [Director of Public Prosecutions; Golden Arrow; CCR]

    Cost of legal proceedings [taxi associations; Golden Arrow; CCR]

    Outreach to other groups [CCR (though not to the exclusion of other parties)]

    Representivity of community safety forums [provincial dept of community safety; community safety forums; CCR]

     


    Back to Report

    Appendix 3:

    PROPOSED AGREEMENT ON PUBLIC COMMUNICATION

    REGARDING THE WESTERN CAPE TRANSPORT CONFLICT

    The parties

    The parties represented at the talks on the Western Cape transport conflict have a constitutional right of freedom of expression. They may also be obliged to communicate their positions to their members and the public.

    The parties will exercise that right and obligation in a responsible manner in order to avoid exacerbating the conflict and provoking violence.

    Accordingly, in verbal and written statements to their members and the public, the parties will:

  • Support respect for the law.

  • Support the resolution of conflict by peaceful means.

  • Discourage intimidation and violence.

  • Refrain from threats of violence against other parties, communities and citizens.

    Where a party wishes to express disagreement with the position of another party, it will avoid insulting that party, its officials and its members.

    The Centre for Conflict Resolution

    When addressing the public through the media, the Centre will provide information on mediation in general; on the process of facilitating the negotiations; and, in consultation with the parties, on any agreements concluded between them.

    The Centre will avoid making comment on the substantive issues in dispute where such comment might be considered prejudicial to the interests of any party.

    Because the transport conflict affects many individuals, organisations and communities, parties that are not directly involved in the negotiations will be invited to communicate their views to the Centre.


     
    Centre for Conflict Resolution, UCT, Private Bag, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa
    Tel: (27) 21-4222512 Fax: (27) 21-4222622 Email: mailbox@ccr.uct.ac.za

     

  •